<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big business is grappling with social media (but still keeping it&#8217;s gloves on &#8230;)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fumoir.com/2008/03/16/big-business-is-grappling-with-social-media-but-still-keeping-its-gloves-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fumoir.com/2008/03/16/big-business-is-grappling-with-social-media-but-still-keeping-its-gloves-on/</link>
	<description>Sit back, chat, and light(en) up about marketing, disruption, innovation and the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.fumoir.com/2008/03/16/big-business-is-grappling-with-social-media-but-still-keeping-its-gloves-on/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fumoir.com/2008/03/16/big-business-is-grappling-with-social-media-but-still-keeping-its-gloves-on/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Interesting to note the view that marketing agencies &#039;don&#039;t get it&#039;. It&#039;s hardly surprising: marketing agencies are often slow on the uptake  because innovation isn&#039;t necessarily part of their DNA. Tried and tested gets results after all.

But there is a more practical reason why big corps shouldn&#039;t use a third party on the social networks: they represent another filter.

If employees are to interact with customers on a social network, then it must be direct, real and authentic. Scripted drones or constrained staff can&#039;t join the conversation. It&#039;s even harder when it&#039;s a marketing agency exec, working from a brief that has been provided by a client.

If big corps are to reap the rewards they need to unshackle their staff, trust them and let them genuinely join the conversation. Anything else is half-baked and doomed to failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to note the view that marketing agencies &#8216;don&#8217;t get it&#8217;. It&#8217;s hardly surprising: marketing agencies are often slow on the uptake  because innovation isn&#8217;t necessarily part of their DNA. Tried and tested gets results after all.</p>
<p>But there is a more practical reason why big corps shouldn&#8217;t use a third party on the social networks: they represent another filter.</p>
<p>If employees are to interact with customers on a social network, then it must be direct, real and authentic. Scripted drones or constrained staff can&#8217;t join the conversation. It&#8217;s even harder when it&#8217;s a marketing agency exec, working from a brief that has been provided by a client.</p>
<p>If big corps are to reap the rewards they need to unshackle their staff, trust them and let them genuinely join the conversation. Anything else is half-baked and doomed to failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
